Justices authorize the National Assembly to hold session until its mandate’s last minute

Until the last minute of the last day of their five-year term, the deputies of the National Assembly can continue discussing and approving laws, additional credits, appointing officials and performing any other task assigned to them by the Constitution, since they are “in full exercise of their powers”.

So was established by the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, in its judgment 1758 of December 2015, in which it answered an interpretation recourse of article 220 of the Constitution that the outgoing president of the parliament, Deputy Diosdado Cabello (PSUV-Monagas ), filed on 16 December and with which he sought to clarify whether he could convene extraordinary plenary meetings and whether the current legislators could exercise all their powers, despite the fact that their period is not only about to expire but that their successors were already elected by the voters.

In the ruling, which was jointly drafted by the seven members of the tribunal, it does not only asserted that an outgoing parliament “is not constitutionally prevented from convening extraordinary sessions”, but also gave it the green light to address during those meetings any matter that most of its members wish to treat, considering that its members are “in full exercise of their powers” and that the fact that they are out in no way implies that their faculties “are diminished”.

Before bringing the action Cabello assured that if the new National Assembly elected on 6 December 2015, in which the Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD) obtained 2/3 of the seats was not installed, they would still work .

The TSJ, in this judgment, endorsed the former National Assembly president’s argument, by stating that “the constitutional period of the National Assembly is five years, and begins on 5 January after the election or the day immediately after possible, and fully exercises its powers and competencies until 4 January after the electoral process that elects the next Assembly, or until, finally, the new Assembly is installed”.

Extract of the Judgment

the Basic Text empowers the National Assembly, the Delegate Committee and the President (…) of the Republic to convene extraordinary sessions (…) the deputies (…) are within the constitutional period for which they were elected, [therefore] there is no restriction to convene extraordinary sessions (…). The limit of the matters to be dealt with in extraordinary sessions shall be fixed by the respective meeting or by the majority of the members of the National Assembly (…) the general constitutional framework considers (…), an open clause (…) when it points out that it is a faculty of the [Assembly] “Everything else that this Constitution and the law indicate”. On the other hand, the Constitution does not establish limit in respect of the number of extraordinary sessions that can take place”.

Datasheet

Diosdado Cabello Rondón in its capacity as president of the National Assembly.
7 days.
I Resolved the interpretation regarding the scope and content of article 220 of the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Joint presentation: Gladys María Gutiérrez Alvarado, Arcadio Delgado Rosales, Francisco Antonio Carrasquero López, Luisa Estella Morales Lamuño, Marcos Tulio Dugarte Padrón, Carmen Zuleta de Merchán and Juan José Mendoza Jover. SC-TSJ-Gladys-Gutierrez-232x300
Share This